Dear Sir/madam,
In India, signing an agreement for 2 years for abroad training and to retain the employees, management is insisting new employees to sign an agreement. I had a same experience in signing an agreement for abroad training for 5 years and to continue the service for 4 years. Even now, very famous organization in Chennai insisting employees to sign an agreement for every 4 years even after completing 20 years of service. This is happening till now.
I left the company after serving 3 years of Contract period and the Management has sent a letter towards due to the company for non completion of agreement terms. Due to Medical ground, I have sent a requisition letter to management to be relieved from service. Finally, they sent a legal notice to me, the Doctors concerned and a new employer also. This matter was taken to Senior Advocate panel for legal correspondence. They have collected a good money from me and they negotiated with Advocate of the employer also. The advocate of the employer side does not agree for anything and Vakalat has been filed from my side. Finally, our panel of advocates came to me narrating the reason that, there is a supreme court order for payment of breach of contract to the employer and the Advocates are helpless in this case. I have no other options left out. This leads to severe mental agony, high cost and time spending for taking a file to advocate again and again is mere futile.
I paid the amount inclusive of employer advocate fees also. All these proceedings was guided by very Senior IR Manager who has retired from the same company. Finally everything was waste and in this circumstances WHERE YOU STAND THIS SAYING BOND IS ONE SIDED AND ILLEGAL?
One more question also putforth:-
Having known the Judgement of Supreme Court for similar cases, Why the Advocates are accepting the cases like mine and creating a mental depression at last without favouring anything. Are they not aware of similar cases before accepting the case? If they are very much aware of the SC Judgement, the Advocates can counsell the Client in a direct route to settle the amount.
I am also a regular visitor of Cite HR and I am also affected.
Please share your further views on the above subject so that it is easy for me to implement a new ideas in the existing company.
regards,
RB
In India, signing an agreement for 2 years for abroad training and to retain the employees, management is insisting new employees to sign an agreement. I had a same experience in signing an agreement for abroad training for 5 years and to continue the service for 4 years. Even now, very famous organization in Chennai insisting employees to sign an agreement for every 4 years even after completing 20 years of service. This is happening till now.
I left the company after serving 3 years of Contract period and the Management has sent a letter towards due to the company for non completion of agreement terms. Due to Medical ground, I have sent a requisition letter to management to be relieved from service. Finally, they sent a legal notice to me, the Doctors concerned and a new employer also. This matter was taken to Senior Advocate panel for legal correspondence. They have collected a good money from me and they negotiated with Advocate of the employer also. The advocate of the employer side does not agree for anything and Vakalat has been filed from my side. Finally, our panel of advocates came to me narrating the reason that, there is a supreme court order for payment of breach of contract to the employer and the Advocates are helpless in this case. I have no other options left out. This leads to severe mental agony, high cost and time spending for taking a file to advocate again and again is mere futile.
I paid the amount inclusive of employer advocate fees also. All these proceedings was guided by very Senior IR Manager who has retired from the same company. Finally everything was waste and in this circumstances WHERE YOU STAND THIS SAYING BOND IS ONE SIDED AND ILLEGAL?
One more question also putforth:-
Having known the Judgement of Supreme Court for similar cases, Why the Advocates are accepting the cases like mine and creating a mental depression at last without favouring anything. Are they not aware of similar cases before accepting the case? If they are very much aware of the SC Judgement, the Advocates can counsell the Client in a direct route to settle the amount.
I am also a regular visitor of Cite HR and I am also affected.
Please share your further views on the above subject so that it is easy for me to implement a new ideas in the existing company.
regards,
RB