BIG BOSS PREMJI AZMI ALONG WITH COLLEAGUES HIT BY DV ACT

Hi, I do not think dating allowance has something to do with it, If the guy/girl has to flirt , he/she will whether he/she gets the allowance or not.
In my opinion , Dating allowance is just one of the perks in the compensation package to attract personnel. If I think about it deeply, then Traveling allowance / Annual holiday package should also be questionable as these can also be used in the wrong way
What I think is the name given to this allowance is wrong, it would be appropriate if it was titled as Entertainment allowance
Now, he/she entertains his/her spouse,parents,children or friends, it is entirely the decision of the person getting the allowance and not the company for God sake.
Hanu

I read the two articles posted by rebel ji and Hanu ji. This is about the DV Act. After Article 51A of the constitution of India I shall come to DV Act.
Article 51A was inserted in 1976. It was during EMERGENCY in the country. The article was beutifully drafted living a vacum for dignity of men. From here psychologically gender imbalancement begins. Now urgent necessity to correct that imbalancement in the mind set,for the reversal of the situation, that is, for gender equality before law.
Once an amendment bill mooted for adding two words "and men" in article 51-A(e) the gender imbalancement start balancing. So please take it seriously.
regards

I totally agree with Dr. Mahanta. The imbalance created in 51A, should be balanced by adding "and men" under (e).
I can not and will not rule out the possibility of misuse of the laws made to help women.
Hanu

Thank you Hanu ji.
Dear all,
After receiving views on this amendment we shall move to DV act.
Please post your views on Article 51-A(e) amendment.
regards

"(e) to promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood amongst all the people of India transcending religious, linguistic and regional or sectional diversities; to renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women; "
to renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of men is not the funtamental duty as per our constitution. What do you dear women folk here think of it?
regards

Just because cases are dropped against two, he faminist cloud is not over. It is straight against women vs.men. Now please go through , efinition of domestic violence u/s3 and definitions (a) and (q) under section 2 of DV Act and calculate your probability of safety:
(a) "aggrieved person" means any woman who is, or has been, in a domestic relationship with the respondent and who alleges to have been subjected to any act of domestic violence by the respondent;"
xxx
q) "respondent" means any adult male person who is, or has been, in a domestic relationship with the aggrieved person and against whom the aggrieved person has sought any relief under this Act:Provided that an aggrieved wife or female living in a relationship in the nature of a marriage may also file a complaint against a relative of the husband or the male partner;"
regards

my question to everybody
how the case got register at first place ?
does there no check if woman file a case ?
why court issued summons as technically Premji is not related to them ?
this can be used to harrash male by woman, what is the protection avaliable to men from such harrasment ?
is there any organization available like NCW ( National commition of woman ) for men also ?
is there any ministry avaliable for men ( like department of women and child welfare ) ?.
where men will go if they got harrashed ?

Very right questions are raised by Sandipani ji. The answers to these questions will reveal how feminism has become a Jean from which escape is impossible.
regards

I saw some videos here related to IPC 498a
http://www.498a.org/video.htm
News :
http://www.498a.org/news.htm
Blog : ( with Gauravs picture )
http://www.saveindianfamily.org/blogs/

Domestic violence Against Husbands on increase in the city , Bangalore.



Thousands of techie's sorry tale of being beaten up by his wife made us think behond resonable that women are misusing laws (a little too flabbergasting considering the fact that the `victim' just needed to take a peek into the history and draw inspiration to bash up his wife in retaliation!), digest this: on an average, more than 170 married men are lost their life each month in Bangalore district due to their abusive wives.



For God’s sake, please look at Suicide Statistics of males and females in SIF-Statistics Page(Please click here).

“These are the statistics emanating from Crime Bureau registered data alone and do not include the cases admitted at private Hospital, many upper class people go to private hospitals where such cases are easily hushed up with the help of corrupt police who push them into ‘unnatural deaths’ ledgers,” says Sumanth of Save Indian Family Foundation, the NGO Asha Kiran that spearheaded the campaign to stop the “Legal Terrorism of India” with reference to Supreme Court of India’s observations, against dowry - Section 498 A – to be corrected.”

What's more, although most of the victims die, less than 2 percent of the cases (only 3 to 4 cases) get registered in a month.

Dowry demand by Modern Wives in the form of New Car and New Houses, tops the list of the crimes, followed by dishonest wife’s adulterate, demand for whole sale free lenience to kill the child before they born etc.

These figures do not include cases of hanging, poisoning and Proxy murder by their Boy friends.

These are not not cooked-up statistics nor those churned out of tinpot surveys or haphazard SMS polls.