I think by " contractual roll" what you meant is that the employee was engaged as a fixed term contract employee initially for a period of one year and the same contract was subsequently renewed year after year upto a span of ten years continuously. So, the contract never came to an end actually but got a new lease of life every year on its renewal. The post indicates the fact that it is the employee who is willing to end the contract by his resignation and not that you are intending to terminate the contract by not renewing it any more. Therefore, it is only a psudo contract of employment just facilitating its termination at the option of the parties to it after a predetermined term and not a contract for service. When the initial contract does not meet its automatic termination as agreed but gets renewed continuously until it is finally terminated, the date of joining or its commencement would be the initial date only and not that an everchanging one as you have argued.
In fact there is not any problem in this issue other than your unwillingness based on your untenable and wrong assumption. The employee has so far served under you for more than 5 years of continuous service and therefore he is eligible to claim gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act,1972 on his resignation any day beyond that period. Gratuity is a terminal benefit of employment based on blemishness and continuity of service under the same employer for a certain number of years. A progressive employer like you has to understand the spirit of the Law.
It's call Gratuity not Graduty.... Plz confirm
And with regards to your query...so please note....
The definition of employee under Sec. 2 (e) of the Gratuity act is not similar to the definition of Employee under PF act and ESI act. The PF and ESI act impose the obligation on Principal Employer to pay contribution for Contract workers. However, Gratuity act does not contain any provision, imposing such obligation on the principal employer in respect of contact workers.
Therefore, Principal Employers are not liable to pay Gratuity.
[A employee joins in my organisation and worked in my organisation for past 10 years of time in contractual role and where the contract is renewed annually. Now he wish to resign from my organisation, Do I want to pay the graduity for him or not.]
As per advice by Mr Umakanthan & Other fellow, I want to add some thing because of Second Last Line of Mr Umakanthan,
Your Organisation ; Employer have engaged that person under renewed contract for last 10 years, It means that Only for escape of gratuity and other terminal benefits you have engaged that person.and taking plea of Contractual Roll ( IE- SHAM Contract) , You can not escape with gratuity if the disputed has been raised before Labour Officials / Court.
Definitely on first instance / Prima face You people are responsible to pay his gratuity.
Yet You may Pay It From Account of Your Contractor
Awaiting suggestion / comments from respected members
In the aforesaid judgment of Karnataka High Court reported in 1989 (58) FLR Page 528, It was held that the gratuity will not be payable by the principal employer to the workers of the contractors. The Calcutta High Court in a case reported in 2010 Labour Law Reporter 1970 has held that the contractor is the person who is liable for payment of gratuity to the employees, since he has also undertaken in the contract to meet statutory liabilities. The Calcutta High Court has held in para 16 that the contractor was employing more than 10 persons and he was carrying on business as a sole proprietor, therefore, he fulfills all the pre-requisites for the applicability of the Payment of Gratuity Act u/s 1 of the Payment of Gratuity Act 1972. However, Madras High Court in a case reported in 2013 (136) FLR Page 50 held that if the contractor, who employs the workers, does not pay gratuity to them, then the principal employer shall be liable to pay the gratuity by virtue of section 21 (4) of the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act 1970. However, I most respectfully do not agree with this view of the Hon’ble Madras High Court. Section 21 (4) of the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act 1970 talks of payment of wages by the principal employer in case the same are not paid by the contractor.
The term ‘wage’ has been defined in clause (h) of section 2 of the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act 1970 as the same as defined in clause (vi) of section 2 of the Payment of Wages Act 1936. The definition of wage in the Payment of Wages Act 1936 clearly excludes in sub-section (6) of section 2, any gratuity payable on the termination of the employment in cases other than those specified in sub-clause (d). Sub-clause (d) of clause (vi) of section 2 Payment of Wages Act states that any sum which by reason of the termination of employment of the person employed is payable under any law, contract or instrument which provides for the payment of such sum, whether with or without deductions, but does not provide for the time within which the payment is to be made. Sub-section (3) of section 7 of the Payment of Gratuity Act 1972 provides that the employer shall arrange to pay the amount of gratuity within thirty days from the date it becomes payable to the person to whom the gratuity is payable.
Gratuity becomes payable to an employee in accordance with section 4 on the termination of his employment if he has rendered continuous service for not less than 5 years, on his superannuation or retirement or resignation or his death or disablement due to accident or disease. Therefore, since a time limit has been provided in law for payment of gratuity, it will not be covered under sub-clause (d) of clause (6) of section 2 of the Payment of Wages Act 1936 and the exclusion in sub-clause (vi) would be applicable and the gratuity will not be treated as ‘wages’ under the Payment of Wages Act 1936 and under Payment of Gratuity Act 1972 also.
Therefore, on the basis of the above analysis, it becomes clear that firstly, even under the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act 1970 (section 21(4), the contractor is the person responsible for making the payment of gratuity. The principal employer becomes liable to pay only wages if the contractor does not pay. But, since gratuity is also not wages under the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act 1970, the principal employer cannot be held liable for payment of gratuity even in case the contractor does not pay gratuity.
Thanking you all for your valuable suggestion in this query related to Gratuity. Which helped me a lot.
I Hope I am a principal Employer. Henceforth the contractor is liable to pay the Gratuity for the Employee.
But my major doubt is the Contractor also says he renewed the contract year by year, hence the Date of Joining for the employee would renewed year by year.
So which is not the continuous service for more than 5 years of time because his Date of Joining would be changing year by year, then how come a contractor is liable to pay the gratuity for him.
Thanks / Regards,