No Tags Found!

avalok
2

Why are the world's wisest single?
Hello!
Have you ever pondered on these enigmas?
Think of:
The Great Founders:-
Jesus - The deemed founder of Christianity - Most followers in the world
Buddha - He became enlightened only after abandoning his family - Second largest followers in the world
Mahaveer - The Jain messiah
Zarathushtra - The Parsi messiah
The exception is Prophet Muhammad.
The Indian sages:-

Sankaracharya
Osho
J Krishnamurthy
Ramana Maharishi
Vivekananda
Ramakrishna Paramhansa
Satya Sai Baba
Shirdi Sai Baba
Sukhbodhananda

The list goes on....
In the history of mankind no female has ever been considered "Enlightened"?! Why?
Does that mean "Marriage" is detrimental to "Enlightenment"?
And women are not capable of becoming "enlightened"?
Think it over.....
Have a nice day.

From India, Bangalore
pranati
49

Simply cause men need to be enlightened - while women have always known the answers that trouble men...
women are like nature mysterious & holding all the answers within them...
while men are men they need to spend years to find one answer & still only a very few are able to do that...

From India, Mumbai
avalok
2

Hi!
V. good reply :D :D
Anyway my question was not about gender difference. I simply was thinking aloud about whether it is necessary to be single to be enlightened.
Still.....
Then why do women become devotess and followers of these Guys by millions?
If women are wiser then why are there no women Founders of religions?
All classical artists,scientists,authors etc. etc. - be it any field - are guys!!!
Why? Why?

From India, Bangalore
avalok
2

Yep. A very vast brutal Majority. Through the ages....
My idea was not to provoke but to initiate an unemotional debate in the best spirit of logical enquiry.
May be certain truths will be revealed in the process.
Pls. do not take it otherwise...
Happy pondering...

From India, Bangalore
avalok
2

Try this exercise ( see attachment ) in Google :twisted: :D
From India, Bangalore
Attached Files (Download Requires Membership)
File Type: png he_invented_853.png (8.1 KB, 154 views)

avalok
2

Discussion thread on why Google says "did you mean 'he invented'..

You can read the whole thread here:

http://reddit.com/info/1o3sy/comments

Google "She invented" Result Did you mean "He invented" (google.com)

275 points posted 2 months ago by noname99

kmactane 96 points 2 months ago

Important note: Google's spell-checker works (I believe) by tracking how often people search for any given word. So if there are five zillion searches for "food" and very few for "fooc" or "foof", it will present "Did you mean food?" as an option.

This result doesn't mean that Google thinks only men invent things. Google doesn't care; it's just an algorithm. This results suggests that a lot of people search for "he invented" and far fewer search for "she invented".

If there's sexism or misogyny here, it's in people's searches, not in Google.

permalink



Rafe 19 points 2 months ago

a lot of people search for "he invented" and far fewer search for "she invented".

So how do you excuse the suggestion to she discovered Radium, a query which should be at least as popular as its counterpart?

permalink parent



bobbane 22 points 2 months ago*

That is interesting:

she discovered radium - 159,000 hits, and "he" is suggested as an alternative

he discovered radium - 267,000 hits

However, if you search for a quoted phrase:

"she discovered radium" - 476 hits, and "he discovered radium" is suggested

"he discovered radium" - 7 hits

So, spelling correction is not purely triggered on the basis of popularity in the index.

permalink parent



truedoughca 5 points 2 months ago*

I'll take a guess. I wonder if this doesn't have something to do with the algorithm for the 'Did You Mean' function, which is separate from the Google search algorithm.

Even with quotations, Google seems to have written its algorithm so that the occurrence of "Did you mean" is dependent on the first argument (she) and the predicate (discovered), not on the second argument (radium). The second argument is ignored. We know that a woman discovered radium (period), but a man may have discovered radium in country X, for example, or "discovered Radium would transmute into Radon...". Although the algorithm may ignore the second argument, it is the second argument that increases the occurrences of 'he' + 'discovered' over 'she'+'discovered.' And this is all that the "did you mean" algorithm cares about.

There may be more hits for "she discovered radium," but hits depend on a separate algorithm. I suppose it could have its advantages, but it's certainly not perfect.

permalink parent

From India, Bangalore
chaubey_shanti
Hello Avalok,
You know woman are all things &we can say the world always in the hand of woman .She is good in all way for example:
1. she is excellent in the role of mother,sister,grandmother,wife and she only who teach his/her son or daughter to how we pray
what is culture,
what is tradition .
2. she is manage very well house & office
she is actually very good religious its other issue if she not famous so much so whatttttttt.
Think about Mira,LATA JI and Mother Tersa
So she is all rounder what you think.
Regards
Shanti

From India, Delhi
avalok
2

Yes Shanti, Well said. I agree. But my main question was " Is it mandatory to be single in order to attain enlightenment?" rgds
From India, Bangalore
chaubey_shanti
Hello Avalok, Yes its depend upon the situation also . why kalidas is become so famous that situation agreed or not. Regards Shanti
From India, Delhi
avalok
2

Hello! Shanti,

Let me reiterate my query:

Is it mandatory to be single in order to get enlightened?

I am not talkig about creative people,intelligent people etc.

It is not about men vs women either. I am just asking "Does one have to be single in order to achieve enlightenment?" Period.

Somebody had mentioned Mirabai and Mother Teresa. Here again Mirabai ignored her husband,separated from him and prayed for Krishna's love.

Mother Teresa was single.

Joan of Arc never married. Also Teresa of Avilla and scores of Women Saints too. They were all singles.

Gautama Siddhartha left his wife and new-born son and wandered around for years before finally achieving Buddhahood.

In fact in Hindu puranas there are countless instances where beautiful apsaras try to disturb sages from reaching Nirvana.

So the conclusion is having a relationship or remaining married is an impediment to Buddhahood, right?

I have never heard of a couple together achieving enlightenment or a group doing the same.

So once again - My question is:

Do you have to be single to become enlightened?

Conclusion: Marriage or companionship is not conducive to becoming Wise!!!

From India, Bangalore
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.






Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.