nanu1953This is another classic example of exploiting casual labor. One sweeper who will work for years but not getting engagement full month to deprive him/her from payment of gratuity. To my opinion gratuity should be paid.
Now come to law point as per new Social Security Code wherein - Chapter V clause 53 (2) and 54(B & C) explained the conditions of payment of Gratuity for less than 240 days work in a year. Please read those two clauses in details to clarify any doubt.
S K Bandyopadhyay ( WB, Howrah)
CEO- USD HR Solutions
From India, New Delhi
umakanthan53Neither the existing PG Act,1972 nor the yet to be notified Code on Social Security,2020 classifies the employees into permanent, temporary or casual for the purpose of continuous service under sections 2-A OR 54 respectively and both are in pari materia only. However, for the purpose of concession only they distinguish the establishments on the basis of their work schedule as working for 6 days-a-week, less than 6 days-a-week, work below the ground in a mine and seasonal working of the establishment respectively under ss (1),(2) and (3) of sec.2-A of the former and clauses (A),(B) and (C) of section 54 of the latter.
Therefore, unless the intermittent breaks are caused at the instance of the employer for bogus reasons, a casual employee cannot stake his claim for gratuity when he has not completed the threshold no of days under the respective category.
From India, Salem
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.