Anonymous
Hello and Greetings,

I had a case study in my organization. The Case Study is as Follows: there is a Union that has submitted a common charter of demand for two plants of the same parent company. The matter is pending before the conciliation officer. The points that the management is objecting to are:

1. Common charter is not maintainable.
2. The Parent company had a demerger, and it split into 2 plants (legal units) that have separate legal identities, and their financial capacity is different.

The demands are asking for the same pay and retirement benefits, etc. What advice can we give the Management regarding the same, and how can we avoid such a scenario wherein the unions also benefit, and the management wouldn't have to bear all the cost?

Thank you.

From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

If the companies are separate and there is no financial interdependency, then the units could be treated as separate. However, if there are common Directors, transfer of employees from one unit to another, transfer of funds on a short-term basis, etc., then it will be difficult to establish that the units are separate. You can put the matter before the Conciliation Officer. It is conciliation only, and as such, you can present your demands to the Officer, and he will convey the same to the Union as well.
From India, Kannur
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear Madhu T K sir, Thankyou for your insights on the topic , it has really helped be get a different perspective of the case. Thankyou so much
From India, Mumbai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.







Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.