Section 79(5) of The Factories Act, 1948 states:
If a worker does not, in any one calendar year, take the whole of the leave allowed to him under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2), as the case may be, any leave not taken by him shall be added to the leave to be allowed to him in the succeeding calendar year.
Provided that the total number of days of leave that may be carried forward to a succeeding year shall not exceed thirty in the case of an adult or forty in the case of a child.
Please clarify whether the management (registered under the Factories Act) can restrict the Leave carried forward to 10 days. If a minimum of 30 days carry forward is to be provided by the Company, are there any Case Laws?
Furthermore, why should only Basic+DA be considered for Leave encashment (Gross Salary is considered for Loss of Pay)?
From India, Bangalore
If a worker does not, in any one calendar year, take the whole of the leave allowed to him under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2), as the case may be, any leave not taken by him shall be added to the leave to be allowed to him in the succeeding calendar year.
Provided that the total number of days of leave that may be carried forward to a succeeding year shall not exceed thirty in the case of an adult or forty in the case of a child.
Please clarify whether the management (registered under the Factories Act) can restrict the Leave carried forward to 10 days. If a minimum of 30 days carry forward is to be provided by the Company, are there any Case Laws?
Furthermore, why should only Basic+DA be considered for Leave encashment (Gross Salary is considered for Loss of Pay)?
From India, Bangalore
Dear Harish Ji,
My opinion on your queries is as follows:
1. You cannot restrict the leave carried forward to 10 days. However, you can start the practice of encashment of leave over and above 10 days.
2. It is not the minimum but the maximum limit. The rationale behind this is that workers are encouraged to avail their leave rather than carry them forward.
3. Firstly, the minimum wage mandated to be paid to the workers consists of basic and dearness allowance. Therefore, for leave encashment, only these two components are relevant. Secondly, other allowances are payable on a monthly basis; hence, there is no requirement to pay them again for that particular month when encashing leave.
Thank you.
From India, Faridabad
My opinion on your queries is as follows:
1. You cannot restrict the leave carried forward to 10 days. However, you can start the practice of encashment of leave over and above 10 days.
2. It is not the minimum but the maximum limit. The rationale behind this is that workers are encouraged to avail their leave rather than carry them forward.
3. Firstly, the minimum wage mandated to be paid to the workers consists of basic and dearness allowance. Therefore, for leave encashment, only these two components are relevant. Secondly, other allowances are payable on a monthly basis; hence, there is no requirement to pay them again for that particular month when encashing leave.
Thank you.
From India, Faridabad
Excellent article! The article about Section 79(5) under the Factories Act, 1948, is quite interesting and unique. I'm glad that I was part of this discussion. Thank you for sharing it with us.
For more information about law firms, visit [Merlyn Law Firm](https://www.merlynlawfirm.com/).
From India, Chennai
For more information about law firms, visit [Merlyn Law Firm](https://www.merlynlawfirm.com/).
From India, Chennai
CiteHR is an AI-augmented HR knowledge and collaboration platform, enabling HR professionals to solve real-world challenges, validate decisions, and stay ahead through collective intelligence and machine-enhanced guidance. Join Our Platform.
CiteHR.AI
(Fact Checked)-The user's reply is correct. (1 Acknowledge point)