Asso.prof.(commerce & Management) Pg
Srinath Sai Ram
Advocate(specialisation In Labour Law
Right to Practise Law is not absolute; Restriction imposed by Section 36(4) of ID Actis not violative of Advocates Act/Article 19(1)(g); Allahabad HC No lawyer has any right to appear in a particular case and debarring a lawyer from one case does notinfringe his righttopractise,theCourt said. Allahabad High Court has held that Section 36(3) and (4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, which disentitles a party to be represented by an Advocate unless with the consent of opposite parties and leave of Labour court, is not violative of Section 29/30 of the Advocates Act read with Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.
Right to Practise Law is not absolute ; Allahabad HC
15th May 2017 From India, Bangalore