Employer's Responsibility - Maternity Benefits - CiteHR
Saswatabanerjee
Partner - Risk Management
Loginmiraclelogistics
Asso.prof.(commerce & Management) Pg
Manojkamble
Sr. Hr Executive
Prabu M
Hr Manager
Srinath Sai Ram
Hr Manager
+1 Other

Cite.Co is a repository of information created by your industry peers and experienced seniors sharing their experience and insights.
Join Us and help by adding your inputs. Contributions From Other Members Follow Below...
Dear Members,

I have a scenario with respect to Maternity Benefits to an employee:

One of our employee who works with us for more than two years has recently come under ESI limit when ESIC increased the wages limit to 21000 and the problem is, She has contributed to ESIC only for three months so far (from Jan to March 2017) and not meeting the eligibility to avail Maternity benefits through ESIC. When she approached to ESIC to enquire on this, they also confirmed the same.

Now, I am confused in terms of understanding the responsibility of an employer and need your advise on followings:

1. Leave with wages during her maternity leave - Generally, any employee who covered under ESI, can claim the wages through ESI but in this

scenario ESI is refused to accept since she has contributed only for three months. So what next to be done.

2. Should Employer pay the salary or Is there any provision to get it through ESIC.

3. What if Employer gives Leave without Pay – Is it advisable.

4. Is there any rules / judgement passed similar to this case.

Kindly give me your views and help me out.

Thanks

Prabu

In absence of ESI being applicable automatically MB act applies abd hence employer has to take responsibility and pay the wages and approve leave as per MB act.
In all fairness a female Employee who is not covered under ESI act should be eligible under the MB Act. Since she has not contributed for the qualifying 'service period' under ESIC, the employer should automatically extend the facilities as per MB Act. No doubt about it.
The act very clearly provides that the act applies in all cases where the esic coverage is not there. The specific scenario is already there in the maternity benefit act, it’s in sec 5
Though Employee is covered under ESI from 01/01/2017, ESI will provide only Medical benefit, since she has not contributed to ESI in 2 Contribution Periods.Consequently, Employer has to Pay maternity benefit to the extent of 26 Weeks Salary subject to Medical certificate.
Contribution period:April to September & October to March

Suppose the female employee covered under ESI could not contribute for 70 days in two consecutive contribution periods due to her long absence on loss of pay,will she be given maternity benefits under MB Act.?
Dear Prabhu,
Please find answer to your queries as below :
1. Leave with wages during her maternity leave - Generally, any employee who covered under ESI, can claim the wages through ESI but in this scenario ESI is refused to accept since she has contributed only for three months. So what next to be done. - Ans : As ESIC not applicable to the respective women employee will fall under Maternity Benefit Act and as per new amendment she is entitle for 26 Weeks of paid maternity leave.
2. Should Employer pay the salary or Is there any provision to get it through ESIC. : Ans - Yes, Employer has to pay the salary in lieu of Maternity Leave
3. What if Employer gives Leave without Pay – Is it advisable. - Ans : Not advisable under MB act
4. Is there any rules / judgement passed similar to this case. - Ans : Not so far
Hope the answers will meet your requirements.

Please log in to ESI IP Portal & take print of her entitlement & put up the same to your management for extending maternity benefit Act, 1961 to her.
Dear Mr Varghese Mathew Sir,
If Any Woman Employee covered under ESI, is not eligible to Claim Maternity Benefit Provided therein for not fulfilling qualifying conditions, she comes under the Purview of The Maternity benefit Act, 1961.Woman Employee should get maternity benefit from the Employer though she is covered under ESI

Sri natham, My question is ,if the non-fulfilment of eligibility conditions under ESI (70 days) is due to the fault of the employee,ie under a unauthorised absence.?

This discussion thread is closed. If you want to continue this discussion or have a follow up question, please post it on the network.
Add the url of this thread if you want to cite this discussion.






About Us Advertise Contact Us
Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service



All rights reserved @ 2020 Cite.Co™