No Tags Found!

rldhingra
23

hi JA2012
please mail the copy of appointment letter , your email address, so that I can give you my legal opinion properly.
Thanks & Regards
RL Dhingra, Advocate
Labour Law Consultant, Delhi & NCR
09818309937
Email: rld_498@rediffmil.com

From India, Delhi
varghesemathew
910

Mr Yadav Where, in the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 , it is said that the Act is not applicable where number is three.? Please refer the section.
From India, Thiruvananthapuram
rdsyadav
142

Dear Mr Mathew.Verghese,
The provisions of ID Act 1947 is applicable where Workman ( as defined under ID Act) are employed in any establishment .Manay learned members hereabove has quoted provisions and given specifically relevant clarification also, I am not repeating again. Its very clear that services of Managers are to be governed in accordance with company policies and specific terms and conditions stipulated in Appointment Letter.
In this case a manager is to be removed , as such ID Act is not applicable .
Please write to my below mail address in case you have any doubt and still wanting any clarification .
Regds,
RDS Yadav
Director, Future Instt. of management and Technology
Labour Law Adviser
Posted 2

From India, Delhi
varghesemathew
910

My point was not in respect to wokman or manager under ID Act.Iwas emphasizing that number of workmen in the Industrial establishments is not a criteria for retrenching a single workman under sec 25 F.
From India, Thiruvananthapuram
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.






Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.