Korgaonkar K A
Ba,llb,mpm,dir&pm,dll&lw,d.cyber
Raajesharya
Founder And Mentor @ Ethical Business Strategists

Thread Started by #raajesharya

Is it necessary to take an undertaking from members of the ICC validating that they were not convicted of sexual harassment in the past? If yes, does the Act mandates it? Thanks.
2nd September 2015 From India, New Delhi
Dear Raajesharya,
According to Section 4(6) of the Act, if any member of ICC including presiding officer:
a. contravenes the provisions of section 16; or
b. has been convicted for an offence or an inquiry into an offence under any law for the time being in force is pending against him; or
c. he has been found guilty in any disciplinary proceedings or a disciplinary proceeding is pending against him; or
d. has so abused his position as to render his continuance in office prejudicial to the public interest,
then, such Presiding Officer or Member, shall be removed from the ICC and the vacancy so created shall be filled by fresh nomination in accordance with the provisions of this section.
Under the circumstances, it is better to have an undertaking from each member of ICC stating the member concerned is not been convicted for an offence or an inquiry into an offence under any law for the time being in force is pending against him.
2nd September 2015 From India, Mumbai
Reply (Add What You Know) Start New Discussion

Cite.Co - is a repository of information created by your industry peers and experienced seniors. Register Here and help by adding your inputs to this topic/query page.
Prime Sponsor: TALENTEDGE - Certification Courses for career growth from top institutes like IIM / XLRI direct to device (online digital learning)





About Us Advertise Contact Us
Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service



All rights reserved @ 2019 Cite.Co™