Cite.Co is a repository of information and resources created by industry seniors and experts sharing their real world insights. Join Network
But in this case the allegation was he received the money from some other bank, in which he was not having any relationship. It is not the DA Case. Let us wait for some expert to give opinion on this issue.
The position of DA case was mentioned in regard to the previous general statement of onus of proof in criminal cases. The issue is mainly termination of queriest service on whatever grounds. In our country, the onus of proof should be governed by the following law:
The Bombay High Court in Mukund Staff And Officers' vs Mukund Ltd. In 2007 held as follows:
"16. Therefore, prima facie the burden lies upon the workmen to establish its claim as specific disputes have been raised against the order of termination and claimed reinstatement of full back wages and continuity of service."

This discussion thread is closed. If you want to continue this discussion or have a follow up question, please post it on the network.
Add the url of this thread if you want to cite this discussion.

About Us Advertise Contact Us
Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2020 Cite.Co™