But in this case the allegation was he received the money from some other bank, in which he was not having any relationship. It is not the DA Case. Let us wait for some expert to give opinion on this issue.
From India, Kumbakonam
1166From India, Kumbakonam
The position of DA case was mentioned in regard to the previous general statement of onus of proof in criminal cases. The issue is mainly termination of queriest service on whatever grounds. In our country, the onus of proof should be governed by the following law:
The Bombay High Court in Mukund Staff And Officers' vs Mukund Ltd. In 2007 held as follows:
"16. Therefore, prima facie the burden lies upon the workmen to establish its claim as specific disputes have been raised against the order of termination and claimed reinstatement of full back wages and continuity of service."
From India, New Delhi
The Bombay High Court in Mukund Staff And Officers' vs Mukund Ltd. In 2007 held as follows:
"16. Therefore, prima facie the burden lies upon the workmen to establish its claim as specific disputes have been raised against the order of termination and claimed reinstatement of full back wages and continuity of service."
From India, New Delhi
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.
Job Description - HR & Admin.doc
SKILLS YOU REQUIRE TO BAG THE JOB YOUWANT.pptx