shreyas3s
Greetings all members !!
Working for a manufacturing company with 6000+ employee base wherein more than 5000 employees come under worker category at factory, earning the salary range of Rs. 6500 to Rs. 10000. And remaining of approx 500 employees, including myself are at Corporate Office level. The EPF is being provided for factory workers, but never for corporate staff. And for the employees joining the organization at corporate level, the employer / HR team is asking the newbie to sign the form or pre-formatted document which specifies not to enroll on to PF.
Is it legal or illegal what employer is doing? The employees at corporate level are helplessly working from ages.
Looking forward for advises in this regard and would highly appreciate the earliest.
Thanks

From India, Bangalore
sanjeev kwatra
11

Dear Sir,

It is illegal if they are asking to sign the per-formatted form . As per the EPF Act. you need to submit your declaration in Form 11 prescribed under the EPF Act.

In this form You have to declare the following:-

* (a) I was last employed in M/s……………………………………………………………….



(Name & full address of the establishment)

and left service on…………………………..[Prior to that, I was employed in]……………..

……………………………from………………………………to………………………………..

* (b) I/Was a member of ……………………………………………………...Provident Fund

and also of the Family Pension Fund from…………………..to………………………..and

but Not……………………………………….

my account numbers Was/Were…………………………………………

* (c) I have/have not drawn any superannuation benefits in respect of my past service from

any employer.

* (d) I have/have not drawn the amount of my Provident Fund/Family Pension Scheme.

* (e) I have/never been a member of any of any Provident fund and/or Family Pension Scheme.


And if your declaration is that you were not covered under the PF with your earlier employer OR you were covered and withdrawn your PF and EPS before joining this establishment. And now you are getting salary more than 6500/- as basic then PF is not mandatory else they will have to enroll you as a member of EPF.

Regards

Sanjeev Kwatra

From India, Delhi
sanjeev kwatra
11

* (a) I was last exployed in M/s……………………………………………………………….

(Name & full address of the establishment)
and left service on…………………………..[Prior to that, I was employed in]……………..
……………………………from………………………………to………………………………..
* (b) I/Was a member of ……………………………………………………...Provident Fund
and also of the Family Pension Fund from…………………..to………………………..and
but Not……………………………………….
my account numbers Was/Were…………………………………………
* (c) I have/have not drawn any superannuation benefits in respect of my past service from
any employer.
* (d) I have/have not drawn the amount of my Provident Fund/Family Pension Scheme.
* (e) I have/never been a member of any of any Provident fund and/or Family Pension Scheme.

From India, Delhi
minkooo
26

Hi Shreyas,

Mr. Sanjeev has rightly pointed out the provision vis a viz the membership requirement of the EPF Scheme. What your HR Department is asking/trying to achieve what was logical exclusion from the PF Membership in the earlier times when the wages of the employees used to be much less and it was really not used to be a preferred tool of retirement considering the absurdly low returns.They are trying to take benefit of this provisions to reduce the Costing.

Anyhow, can you share the per-formated letter which they are trying to get and signed from the new employees (hide company's name for obvious reasons) so as to check if it'll be valid if contested by the Department or an employee (who has denied membership) based on this wrong declaration. The law just asks the employer to decide the employees EPF membership based on the declaration he makes in Form-11 and if the employees, do not declare anything about its previous membership/being denied the same ( as your HR is doing) one can do nothing because the Company when challenged will take shelter of the declaration they are obtaining by hook or crook.

I don't think one can do much in this given scenario because the company'll always have upper hand to use this provisions to its advantage.

Sincerely,

Amit Kumar




From India, Delhi
varghesemathew
910

It is illegal to get signature on any form other than Form 11 under EPF.If any employee declares that he was earlier PF member and has not withdrawn the PF accumulation he shall be covered in EPF If the Co is covered by EPF Act.
Varghese Mathew
9961266966

From India, Thiruvananthapuram
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.





Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ฎ

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.