Dear Fellow HR,
Will you be able to provide me with an example on the Lev and Schwartz methodology of Human capital accounting? I would need to understand how the calculation actually works.
Thanking you in advance for your help.
6th August 2007 From India

Member Opinions In This Discussion
M.Peer Mohamed Sardhar
India, Coimbatore
Human Resources
India, New Delhi
Inductions N Trainings
India, Mumbai

Kindly click on the following link, it will give you some required information,
7th August 2007 From India, Coimbatore
Thanks for the info. I have already searched the site for the example. There are a lot of definitions but no explanation on the calculations. I need the sample calculation to understand the topic.
Looking for an example please.
7th August 2007 From India
10th August 2007 From India, Coimbatore
Attached Files
File Type: pdf lev_and_schwartz_120.pdf (506.7 KB, 1174 views)
File Type: pdf lev_and_schwartz_120.pdf (506.7 KB, 379 views)
dear all i could not open the L & S pdf file... can any one attach the sam eonce more please thanx
4th October 2007 From India, Mumbai

may this will help u a bit....

Lev and Schw artz’s model is based on human capital theory,

which recognizes human capital as one of several forms of holding wealth for a business enterprise, such as money, securities and physical capital. In this model of accounting, human capital is treated like other forms of earning assets and thus is an important factor explaining

and predicting the future economic growth of the company.

Lev and Schw artz’s accounting model is based on the measurement of human capital using the formula:

Vr = ÓTt=r I(t)/(1+r)t-r,

where Vr = the human capital value of a person “r” years old;

I(t) = the person’s annual earnings up to retirement;

r = a discount rate specific to the person;

T =retirement age

The formula uses an earnings profile, which is a graphic mathematical

representation of the income stream generated by a person. Typically, earnings increase with age. As the person reaches retirement age, productivity declines as a result of technological obsolescence and health deterioration.

This model postulated in 1971 remains largely unused as a result of criticism from Accounting professionals who argue that human capital cannot be purchased or owned by the firm and therefore would not be recognized as an asset. Additionally, critics of human capital theory state that labor force does not have a “service potential”; meaning employees are paid for rendering current services and no asset is formed by these



4th October 2007 From India, New Delhi
Thanks for your comments. Do you have an examle calculation for the same? It would help us understand better if we have a sample calculation based on an assumption of a company say employing 10 personnel with age groups 23 to 30 and 30 to 40.
Your reply will help me a lot.
Thanks in advance.
4th October 2007 From India
thanx a lot sir i can able to download it... is it possible to get case study of Infosys in this regard regards
5th October 2007 From India, Mumbai
A platform for business and professional insights. Register at Cite.Co and grow professionally with your peers around the world.

Disclaimer: This network and the advice provided in good faith by our members only facilitates as a direction towards the actions necessary. The advice should be validated by proper consultation with a certified professional. The network or the members providing advice cannot be held liable for any consequences, under any circumstances.

About Us - Advertise - Contact Us - RSS   On Google+  
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Terms Of Service
Facebook Page | Follow Us On Twitter | Linkedin Network