No Tags Found!

deepa2rani
12

Employers need not pay provident fund contribution higher than the prescribed ceiling. (Supreme Court)
A vague charge-sheet will vitiate enquiry. (Supreme Court)
Delinquent be heard when Disciplinary Authority differs with Enquiry Officer. (Supreme Court)
Gratuity can’t be claimed before Labour Court. (AP HC)
Travelling allowance is excluded from ‘wages’ under ESI Act. (AP HC)
Bias against enquiry officer untenable without supporting reasons. (P&H HC)
Gross indiscipline will justify termination. (P&H HC)
Nature of duties not designation is determining factor as to whether an employee is a ‘workman’ or not.
(Karn. HC)
Dispensation of enquiry appropriate when holding is not possible. (Del. HC)
Removal justified when the employee neither complies transfer nor appears before medical board. (Del. HC)
Settlement for specific duration will continue to be effective till it is substituted. (Del. HC)
A charge-sheet for theft should be precise. (Mad. HC)

From India, Delhi
Sundar1959
66

Sorry not Labour Law Journal. IT SHOULD BE READ AS LABOUR LAW REPORTER. Sorry for the error.
From India, Madras
Sundar1959
66

If that be the case - always write the first line - thanks to ... (so & so). Courtesy: LLR and then put the matter.
The people who have provided the information will atleast expect these kind of acknowledgements.
Please ...

From India, Madras
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.





Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.