Madras High Court Ruling On The Applicability Of PF Contb On Certain Allowances - CiteHR
Labour Law
Hr C&b Professional
+2 Others

Cite.Co is a repository of information created by your industry peers and experienced seniors sharing their experience and insights.
Join Us and help by adding your inputs. Contributions From Other Members Follow Below...
Hi All,
I have this new ruling by Madras High Court on the applicability of Provident Fund contributions on certain allowances. Looking forward for views / impact on organisations on the same.
The Madras High Court in the case of Reynolds Pens India Pvt Ltd and other petitioners (‘Petitioners’) vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (‘RPFC’) has held that certain allowances such as Conveyance, Educational Allowances, Food concession, Medical, Special Holidays, Night Shift Incentive, City Compensatory Allowances etc. should be treated as part of Basic wages under the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (‘EPF Act’). Accordingly, provident fund (‘PF’) contributions should be remitted on such allowances. "
The Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (‘EPFO’) has in a recent internal communication1 forwarded the aforesaid judgment to its officers and directed them to utilise this judgement as per the merits of each case.

Dear All,
Here is that landmark judgment by Madras High Court.
I have highlighted some portions for easy reading.
I request our members to go through this and post their valuable comments...
Excellent Hr Services,

Attached Files
Membership is required for download. Create An Account First
File Type: doc MADRAS HIGH COURT'S LANDMARK JUDGEMENT.doc (95.5 KB, 1270 views)

Thanks for the posting.
Please refer the CPFC's letter dated 23rd May 2011, asking the RPFC's to see PF contribution should be paid at least on minimum wages.Now this madras High court order has come. Two different guidances.Which is correct ?
To my knowledge there should be suitable amendment in the act itself. Because the Act has been enacted long back according to that period. Now things has changed a lot. New salary components are introduced as the nature of work demands.
PF authorities are just reacting to the judgements given by the court every now and then. Tomorrow another judgement will come, then they will refer that.
There should be a concrete guidance, which will enable both Employers as well as Employees about their commitment towards PF contribution.

vetrisc, could you please tell me where i could find the letter from the CPFC to the RPFC that you mentioned. or could you tell me what the letter stated. thanks
Dear all,
As we all know the endless argument go's on and on. I think we have to keep our cool till the EPF organisation wakes up. Because they them self do not know what the act implies and waiting for the Court orders to come one by one to tell us what are all the components covered for PF contribution.Please note that,
1) A review Petitions have been filed before the Madhya Pradesh High Court (Gwalior Bench) which would come up for hearing on 29th July, 2011.
2) A Writ Appeal has also been filed in the High Court of Madras which is likely to come up for hearing on or around 8th August, 2011.
Wait for the judgements to come from the above petition and appeal to come.

As per offer document of Hinduja Foundries : "We challenged this decision of the PF Commissioner vide W.P. 22480 of 2010 before the Madras High Court, which was dismissed vide order dated June 7, 2011. We have filed a writ appeal numbered 1096 of 2011 on July 6, 2011, before the Division Bench of the Madras High Court, against the said order. The High Court has vide order dated October 10, 2011 granted an interim stay of the operation of the impugned order"
This discussion thread is closed. If you want to continue this discussion or have a follow up question, please post it on the network.
Add the url of this thread if you want to cite this discussion.

About Us Advertise Contact Us
Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2020 Cite.Co™