hiren chheda
11

Dear Members
Attached Supreme Court Judgement under ESI Act is short of new dispute which requires in-depth discussion and I humbly request Respected Members to write article on it in the present thread.
HIREN CHHEDA
09821078457

From India, Mumbai
Attached Files (Download Requires Membership)
File Type: pdf SC 09 ESI IMP on Applicability.pdf (355.0 KB, 2757 views)

akanoray
28

Hi Hiren, I think these are an important judgements and hope this will help to all HR & IR professionals. Avinash Kanoray
From India, Pune
kumaresank
18

In my opinion this judgement has peculiar set of fact such as daily employees or wages r engaged for work, so the mgmt could not identity them daily and also feels that they r cannot or may be willing to get engaged daily. Thus impleading the workers as party to proceeding wud araise....
In other regular case like fight to extra or wrong contribution calculations the impleading of workers would not arise.

From India, Tiruchchirappalli
SANTOSHGUPTA1971
1

Dear Friends,
I want to clear my doubt on following issues;
If doing any addition construction Work in the premises of the factory, is ESI is payable for contract labour engaged in construction work?.

From India, Shillong
Attached Files (Download Requires Membership)
File Type: pdf SUPREME COURT-STAY ORDER (ESI IN CONST.) UPLOADED INTO ESI PORTAL.pdf (220.3 KB, 255 views)

Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.





Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.