Dear Members
Attached Supreme Court Judgement under ESI Act is short of new dispute which requires in-depth discussion and I humbly request Respected Members to write article on it in the present thread.
HIREN CHHEDA
09821078457

From India, Mumbai

Attached Files (Download Requires Membership)
File Type: pdf SC 09 ESI IMP on Applicability.pdf (355.0 KB, 2715 views)

Hi Hiren, I think these are an important judgements and hope this will help to all HR & IR professionals. Avinash Kanoray
From India, Pune
In my opinion this judgement has peculiar set of fact such as daily employees or wages r engaged for work, so the mgmt could not identity them daily and also feels that they r cannot or may be willing to get engaged daily. Thus impleading the workers as party to proceeding wud araise....
In other regular case like fight to extra or wrong contribution calculations the impleading of workers would not arise.

From India, Tiruchchirappalli
Dear Friends,
I want to clear my doubt on following issues;
If doing any addition construction Work in the premises of the factory, is ESI is payable for contract labour engaged in construction work?.

From India, Shillong

Attached Files (Download Requires Membership)
File Type: pdf SUPREME COURT-STAY ORDER (ESI IN CONST.) UPLOADED INTO ESI PORTAL.pdf (220.3 KB, 229 views)

If you are knowledgeable about any fact, resource or experience related to this topic - please add your views using the reply box below. For articles and copyrighted material please only cite the original source link. Each contribution will make this page a resource useful for everyone.

Please Login To Add Reply →






About Us Advertise Contact Us Testimonials
Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2021 CiteHRô

All Material Copyright And Trademarks Posted Held By Respective Owners.
Panel Selection For Threads Are Automated - Members Notified Via CiteMailer Server