Attached Supreme Court Judgement under ESI Act is short of new dispute which requires in-depth discussion and I humbly request Respected Members to write article on it in the present thread.
From India, Mumbai
In my opinion this judgement has peculiar set of fact such as daily employees or wages r engaged for work, so the mgmt could not identity them daily and also feels that they r cannot or may be willing to get engaged daily. Thus impleading the workers as party to proceeding wud araise....
In other regular case like fight to extra or wrong contribution calculations the impleading of workers would not arise.
From India, Tiruchchirappalli
I want to clear my doubt on following issues;
If doing any addition construction Work in the premises of the factory, is ESI is payable for contract labour engaged in construction work?.
From India, Shillong
If you are knowledgeable about any fact, resource or experience related to this topic - please add your views using the reply box below. For articles and copyrighted material please only cite the original source link. Each contribution will make this page a resource useful for everyone.