In my view u have not signed contract/appointment letter so question of breech does notarise
and legally they can not sue you.
j s malik
3rd October 2008 From India, Delhi
Any way, thanks for validating my thinking.but still i am v worried...they may just held my releiving letter.
Can you pls clearify on one more thing?
In my offer letter it says "Bank can terminate ur services by giving one month notice during probation period".it never mentions if i can also resign by giving one months' notice.I think i should be from either side....They are asking me to give 3 months notice which is applicable to confirmed employees.If there is any specific clause related to Probationers,then that should be applicable of any general condition for 3 months notice.
Any way, thanks for helping me.
3rd October 2008 From India, Pune
regarding holding relieving letter u can understand yourself.
j s malik
4th October 2008 From India, Delhi
4th October 2008 From India, Pune
One side agreement is no agreement. Yes, if they are sending you on training abroad and investing money on training than the Bank has the right to recover the money; subject to the condition that both the parties have signed the agreement in token of their acceptance. Since you have not signed the bond, they can't demand the4 bond amount. Pl return the bond copy duly signed by you that the bond is not acceptable and also submit your resingation simulteneously.
5th October 2008 From India, Guwahati
they have not given the bond to as of now.i dont know the terms and conditions of it but in my offer of employment letter,it was mentioned that i have to execute a service bond .
Now as i have resigned and i am under notice period,my boss is insisting that "what if you have not signed the bond,you agreed to it while accepting the offer letter".
Although nothing has come up in writing from my HR Dept,still i am worried if they really arm twist to give RS 2L .
All the employment agreements are always one sided.Do you suggest that ALL of them all illegal ?
5th October 2008 From India, Pune
I have gone through content of every one, i will request all of you that please read THE BONDED LABOUR SYSTEM(ABOLITION)ACT 1976
the act clearly say thet you can not have any bond related to employment even if any one have or welling to have such agreement will not be valid agreement or contract (please note every one)
Mean under the law such contract or agreement will not be valid and person affected can approch to the court.
6th October 2008
after resignation stating the bond terms which the BEML implemented recently to all employees which states that no employee can resign within three yrs of joing the organisation if so they have to pay 2 la.
6th October 2008 From India, Bangalore
thanks once again for showing interest in my cause.
You mean to say that case has been decided in favor of the employee.I tried to find the said case No(9931 of Year 2008) from High Court of Karnataka site but site ask for Case Type(AC,CA,CMP,COA).I am not a legal pundit so all these terms are very tough although they may have obvious meaning for you.
Thanks in advance for helping me.
6th October 2008 From India, Pune