Dismissal is termination by way of disciplinary action entailing forfeiture of all benefits of separation. Termination is cessation of the contract of employement which can be otherwise than by way of disciplinary action, also. Thus, all dismissals can be categorised as Termination but vice-versa is not correct.
AS
From India, New Delhi
AS
From India, New Delhi
TERMINATION
An individual can face termination of employment, or job loss, for one of many reasons.
The most drastic termination of employment is involuntary termination, in its most severe form known as "firing" or "sacking". A less severe form is to be laid off or made redundant, which is usually not strictly related to personal performance but economic cycles or the company's need to restructure itself.
In a postmodern risk economy, such as that of the United States, a large proportion of workers will be laid off at some time in their life, and often not for reasons related to performance or ethics.
In many countries, in particular in social democracies as found in western Europe, firing an employee is expensive and risky in that firings require extensive documentation (in the event of a wrongful-termination lawsuit), and because fired employees may sue their former employers, disclose trade secrets to competitors, expose illegal practices or become extremely violent. Finally, in the United States, unemployment benefits are financed by companies, and a firm's unemployment costs increase with each worker laid off or fired. Depending on the circumstances and company policy, a fired employee may or may not be entitled to a severance package or unemployment benefits.
Types of termination
Involuntary termination
The classic definition of terminating someone's employment is being fired, or in technical terms involuntary termination. In the workplace, an employee may be fired for many reasons:
Work performance that fails to meet a given standard, especially over a period of time.
Chronic absence.
Constant or gross insubordination, or other inability to properly relate (i.e., get along) with co-workers and/or customers.
Inappropriate conduct or misconduct.
Engaging in illegal activities on the job (such as embezzlement).
Any other failing as deemed appropriate by a workplace manager or supervisor.
In the United States, most states have adopted the at-will employment contract that allows the employer to dismiss employees without having to provide any of the reasons listed above.
In some cases, an employee's off-the-job behavior could result in his losing his/her job (e.g., a drunk driving arrest, especially if the employee's principal responsibilities require driving). At some businesses, a security officer may escort a "fired" employee from the workplace to the parking lot upon his/her dismissal.
Synonyms for being "fired" include sacked, released, discharged, and dismissed, and coloquially canned or axed. One euphemism for being terminated is being let go.
Effects of termination
Rarely is a decision to fire an employee arrived at lightly, or is it as dramatic as portrayed on television (such as with the WWE, when Vince McMahon "fires" an employee as part of a storyline) or in the movies.
Depending on the jurisdiction, a supervisor and/or workplace manager must keep extensive documentation of employees — including records of disciplinary action, evaluations, attendance records, and correspondence from supervisors, co-workers and customers. Often, these items can be used in determining whether to terminate an employee considered for such an action. In some cases, certain disciplinary records, evaluations and relevant information must be expunged from the employee's file after a specified time period.
Often, an involuntary termination is part of a "progressive step" process, meaning the employee will have been warned for his/her work performance and/or conduct and given an opportunity to improve before more severe measures are taken. However, immediate termination may be enacted for severe cases, such as fighting, on-the-job sexual harassment or other zero tolerance offenses. Often, workplace managers require giving an employee due process, giving the worker a chance to show why he/she should be allowed to keep his/her job; they may also be required to give a terminated employee the option to appeal his/her firing.
In addition to the risks and resulting consequences involved with involuntary terminations, there is the matter of unemployment benefits. In the United States, these benefits are financed by companies; a firm's unemployment costs increase with each worker laid off or fired. Therefore, more common are de facto firings, which are classified as "voluntary" termination.
To be fired (or any of its synonyms), as opposed to being laid off, is generally thought to be dishonorable and a sign of failure. In some cases, it may hinder the now job-seeker's chances of finding new employment, particularly if he/she has been fired several times. However, in today's society, getting fired is also highly common. Most Americans will be fired at some time in their life, and not always because of any moral failing or lack of a work ethic.
Summary termination
In cases of extreme gross misconduct, an employer may pursue summary dismissal or instant dismissal, where an employee is dismissed on the spot. Under UK law, employers are not required to give notice for such terminations, so long as there is just cause.
Discriminatory and retalitory termination
In some cases, the firing of an employee is a discriminatory act. Although an employer may often claim the dismissal was for "just cause," these discriminatory acts are often because of the employee's physical or mental disability, or perhaps his/her age, race, gender, HIV status or sexual orientation. Other unjust firings may result from a workplace manager or supervisor wanting to retaliate against an employee. Often, this is because the worker reported wrongdoing (often, but not always sexual harassment or other misconduct) on the part of the supervisor. Such terminations are usually illegal. Many successful lawsuits have resulted from discriminatory or retalitory termination.
Discriminatory or retalitory termination by a supervisor can take the form of administrative process. In this form the rules of the instituton are used as the basis for termination. For example, if a place of employment has a rule that prohibits personal phone calls, receiving or making personal calls can be the grounds for termination even though it may be a common practice within the organzation.
Forced resignations
In addition to the risks and costs of firing an employee, firing a high-profile individual such as a school superintendent, an executive, or a public official often leads to rumor and factionalism; people who sympathized with the fired employee will be drawn against the person responsible for one's termination.
To avoid this, and to allow the dismissed employee to "save face" in a more "graceful" exit, the employer will often ask the employee to resign "voluntarily" from his or her position. If the employee chooses not to resign, the processes necessary to fire him or her will be pursued, and the employee will usually be fired. The resignation thus makes it unclear whether the resignation was forced or voluntary, and this opaqueness benefits both parties; for instance, the "fired" employee is more easily able to seek new employment in his/her given field.
High-profile individuals, when forced to resign from a job, will often claim that they resigned over "creative differences" or "to spend more time with their family". However, even these reasons can create rumors.
Changes of conditions
Firms that wish for an employee to exit of his or her own accord, but do not wish to pursue firing or forced resignation, may degrade the employee's working conditions, hoping that he or she will leave "voluntarily". The employee may be moved to a different geographical location, assigned to an undesirable shift, given too few hours if part time, demoted (or relegated to a menial task), or assigned to work in uncomfortable conditions. Other forms of manipulation may be used, such as being unfairly hostile to the employee, and punishing him or her for things that are deliberately overlooked with other employees.
Such tactics may amount to constructive dismissal, which is illegal in some jurisdictions.
Layoffs and furloughs
Finally, termination of employment can happen as a result of layoffs, also known as "downsizing", "reduction in force", or "redundancy", which are not firings. A laid-off employee's job is terminated and not re-filled, because the company wishes to reduce its size or operations, not for performance-related reasons. In rare cases, laid-off employees are re-hired by their respective companies, though by this time they have usually found new jobs.
If a company is in the process of either economic troubles and/or recent previous layoffs and they ask you to "cross-train" someone to fill in your duties "in case you are gone," chances are that a lay off process may proceed shortly.
From India, Delhi
113An individual can face termination of employment, or job loss, for one of many reasons.
The most drastic termination of employment is involuntary termination, in its most severe form known as "firing" or "sacking". A less severe form is to be laid off or made redundant, which is usually not strictly related to personal performance but economic cycles or the company's need to restructure itself.
In a postmodern risk economy, such as that of the United States, a large proportion of workers will be laid off at some time in their life, and often not for reasons related to performance or ethics.
In many countries, in particular in social democracies as found in western Europe, firing an employee is expensive and risky in that firings require extensive documentation (in the event of a wrongful-termination lawsuit), and because fired employees may sue their former employers, disclose trade secrets to competitors, expose illegal practices or become extremely violent. Finally, in the United States, unemployment benefits are financed by companies, and a firm's unemployment costs increase with each worker laid off or fired. Depending on the circumstances and company policy, a fired employee may or may not be entitled to a severance package or unemployment benefits.
Types of termination
Involuntary termination
The classic definition of terminating someone's employment is being fired, or in technical terms involuntary termination. In the workplace, an employee may be fired for many reasons:
Work performance that fails to meet a given standard, especially over a period of time.
Chronic absence.
Constant or gross insubordination, or other inability to properly relate (i.e., get along) with co-workers and/or customers.
Inappropriate conduct or misconduct.
Engaging in illegal activities on the job (such as embezzlement).
Any other failing as deemed appropriate by a workplace manager or supervisor.
In the United States, most states have adopted the at-will employment contract that allows the employer to dismiss employees without having to provide any of the reasons listed above.
In some cases, an employee's off-the-job behavior could result in his losing his/her job (e.g., a drunk driving arrest, especially if the employee's principal responsibilities require driving). At some businesses, a security officer may escort a "fired" employee from the workplace to the parking lot upon his/her dismissal.
Synonyms for being "fired" include sacked, released, discharged, and dismissed, and coloquially canned or axed. One euphemism for being terminated is being let go.
Effects of termination
Rarely is a decision to fire an employee arrived at lightly, or is it as dramatic as portrayed on television (such as with the WWE, when Vince McMahon "fires" an employee as part of a storyline) or in the movies.
Depending on the jurisdiction, a supervisor and/or workplace manager must keep extensive documentation of employees — including records of disciplinary action, evaluations, attendance records, and correspondence from supervisors, co-workers and customers. Often, these items can be used in determining whether to terminate an employee considered for such an action. In some cases, certain disciplinary records, evaluations and relevant information must be expunged from the employee's file after a specified time period.
Often, an involuntary termination is part of a "progressive step" process, meaning the employee will have been warned for his/her work performance and/or conduct and given an opportunity to improve before more severe measures are taken. However, immediate termination may be enacted for severe cases, such as fighting, on-the-job sexual harassment or other zero tolerance offenses. Often, workplace managers require giving an employee due process, giving the worker a chance to show why he/she should be allowed to keep his/her job; they may also be required to give a terminated employee the option to appeal his/her firing.
In addition to the risks and resulting consequences involved with involuntary terminations, there is the matter of unemployment benefits. In the United States, these benefits are financed by companies; a firm's unemployment costs increase with each worker laid off or fired. Therefore, more common are de facto firings, which are classified as "voluntary" termination.
To be fired (or any of its synonyms), as opposed to being laid off, is generally thought to be dishonorable and a sign of failure. In some cases, it may hinder the now job-seeker's chances of finding new employment, particularly if he/she has been fired several times. However, in today's society, getting fired is also highly common. Most Americans will be fired at some time in their life, and not always because of any moral failing or lack of a work ethic.
Summary termination
In cases of extreme gross misconduct, an employer may pursue summary dismissal or instant dismissal, where an employee is dismissed on the spot. Under UK law, employers are not required to give notice for such terminations, so long as there is just cause.
Discriminatory and retalitory termination
In some cases, the firing of an employee is a discriminatory act. Although an employer may often claim the dismissal was for "just cause," these discriminatory acts are often because of the employee's physical or mental disability, or perhaps his/her age, race, gender, HIV status or sexual orientation. Other unjust firings may result from a workplace manager or supervisor wanting to retaliate against an employee. Often, this is because the worker reported wrongdoing (often, but not always sexual harassment or other misconduct) on the part of the supervisor. Such terminations are usually illegal. Many successful lawsuits have resulted from discriminatory or retalitory termination.
Discriminatory or retalitory termination by a supervisor can take the form of administrative process. In this form the rules of the instituton are used as the basis for termination. For example, if a place of employment has a rule that prohibits personal phone calls, receiving or making personal calls can be the grounds for termination even though it may be a common practice within the organzation.
Forced resignations
In addition to the risks and costs of firing an employee, firing a high-profile individual such as a school superintendent, an executive, or a public official often leads to rumor and factionalism; people who sympathized with the fired employee will be drawn against the person responsible for one's termination.
To avoid this, and to allow the dismissed employee to "save face" in a more "graceful" exit, the employer will often ask the employee to resign "voluntarily" from his or her position. If the employee chooses not to resign, the processes necessary to fire him or her will be pursued, and the employee will usually be fired. The resignation thus makes it unclear whether the resignation was forced or voluntary, and this opaqueness benefits both parties; for instance, the "fired" employee is more easily able to seek new employment in his/her given field.
High-profile individuals, when forced to resign from a job, will often claim that they resigned over "creative differences" or "to spend more time with their family". However, even these reasons can create rumors.
Changes of conditions
Firms that wish for an employee to exit of his or her own accord, but do not wish to pursue firing or forced resignation, may degrade the employee's working conditions, hoping that he or she will leave "voluntarily". The employee may be moved to a different geographical location, assigned to an undesirable shift, given too few hours if part time, demoted (or relegated to a menial task), or assigned to work in uncomfortable conditions. Other forms of manipulation may be used, such as being unfairly hostile to the employee, and punishing him or her for things that are deliberately overlooked with other employees.
Such tactics may amount to constructive dismissal, which is illegal in some jurisdictions.
Layoffs and furloughs
Finally, termination of employment can happen as a result of layoffs, also known as "downsizing", "reduction in force", or "redundancy", which are not firings. A laid-off employee's job is terminated and not re-filled, because the company wishes to reduce its size or operations, not for performance-related reasons. In rare cases, laid-off employees are re-hired by their respective companies, though by this time they have usually found new jobs.
If a company is in the process of either economic troubles and/or recent previous layoffs and they ask you to "cross-train" someone to fill in your duties "in case you are gone," chances are that a lay off process may proceed shortly.
From India, Delhi
Thanks a lot Archana.
In today's world of Communication and information, I believe we can bring about REVOLUTION.
It's great to be a member of such a FORUM.
Thanks again! & Yeah thanks all to show interest!
In today's world of Communication and information, I believe we can bring about REVOLUTION.
It's great to be a member of such a FORUM.
Thanks again! & Yeah thanks all to show interest!
Hi,
Nonrenewal, Termination, and Dismissal
Posted by Mindscape on 7/24/2006 4:58:24 PM
Hi Everyone:
This seems to be a great site for discuessing difficulties with contracts in residency.
Can someone please tell me if there's a difference between nonrenewal, termination, and dismissal? Thanks.
Re: Nonrenewal, Termination, and Dismissal
Posted by res on 7/24/2006 9:47:19 PM
nonrenewal is that your contract does not get renewed at the end of your last contract term. sometimes you get creidt for the year, sometimes you do not.
termination or dismissal is about the same, meaning being fired unwillingly. you may get a few months credit.
what triggers nonrenewal, and what termination, dismissal? I could not figure out. Maybe when the malignant PD misses a dose of his psych med would trigger either one at any time (nonrenewal at end of term).
when you are going to find a new program, the new program presumes that the PD did it for a justified reason - meaning you have to admit your fault. In other words, they 'think' you must be very bad because supposedly the program did everything to educate you and you could not be educated and have to be fired. In their subconsciousness, they must be thinking some of these are still strong residents - otherwise, they would not be seeking to hire one o f these failing residents in other programs. what a contradiction!
Re: Re: Nonrenewal, Termination, and Dismissal
Posted by Mindscape on 7/24/2006 10:11:31 PM
Yeah, I see what you're saying, but I think the terms are viewed differently in the eyes of licensing boards and others.
I think termination or dismissal or being asked to leave means that you were essentially fired during the course of your residencey training for one reason or another.
I believe this is looked at differntly than nonrenewal, which simply means you did not get offered a contract for the upcoming year.
Any comments?
Re: Re: Re: Nonrenewal, Termination, and Dismissal
Posted by res on 7/24/2006 10:47:50 PM
for all you have to explain why it happened nontheless - what makes the difference is what kind of letters you get really. nonrenewal without any credits is no better situation, i think, than a dismissal. nonrenewal with credits, you still need to discuss your competency. it maybe better than a dismissal - at least you got one year's credit. you have to show that you are competent for the next level somehow. it sucks and is difficult either way.
to the medical board, it maybe a different story - each medical board is even different (what a messed up system for messed up people).
For detail, pls see following website:
http://residentweb.com <link updated to site home>
Regards
Sidheshwar
From India, Bangalore
Nonrenewal, Termination, and Dismissal
Posted by Mindscape on 7/24/2006 4:58:24 PM
Hi Everyone:
This seems to be a great site for discuessing difficulties with contracts in residency.
Can someone please tell me if there's a difference between nonrenewal, termination, and dismissal? Thanks.
Re: Nonrenewal, Termination, and Dismissal
Posted by res on 7/24/2006 9:47:19 PM
nonrenewal is that your contract does not get renewed at the end of your last contract term. sometimes you get creidt for the year, sometimes you do not.
termination or dismissal is about the same, meaning being fired unwillingly. you may get a few months credit.
what triggers nonrenewal, and what termination, dismissal? I could not figure out. Maybe when the malignant PD misses a dose of his psych med would trigger either one at any time (nonrenewal at end of term).
when you are going to find a new program, the new program presumes that the PD did it for a justified reason - meaning you have to admit your fault. In other words, they 'think' you must be very bad because supposedly the program did everything to educate you and you could not be educated and have to be fired. In their subconsciousness, they must be thinking some of these are still strong residents - otherwise, they would not be seeking to hire one o f these failing residents in other programs. what a contradiction!
Re: Re: Nonrenewal, Termination, and Dismissal
Posted by Mindscape on 7/24/2006 10:11:31 PM
Yeah, I see what you're saying, but I think the terms are viewed differently in the eyes of licensing boards and others.
I think termination or dismissal or being asked to leave means that you were essentially fired during the course of your residencey training for one reason or another.
I believe this is looked at differntly than nonrenewal, which simply means you did not get offered a contract for the upcoming year.
Any comments?
Re: Re: Re: Nonrenewal, Termination, and Dismissal
Posted by res on 7/24/2006 10:47:50 PM
for all you have to explain why it happened nontheless - what makes the difference is what kind of letters you get really. nonrenewal without any credits is no better situation, i think, than a dismissal. nonrenewal with credits, you still need to discuss your competency. it maybe better than a dismissal - at least you got one year's credit. you have to show that you are competent for the next level somehow. it sucks and is difficult either way.
to the medical board, it maybe a different story - each medical board is even different (what a messed up system for messed up people).
For detail, pls see following website:
http://residentweb.com <link updated to site home>
Regards
Sidheshwar
From India, Bangalore
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.
Termination-emp loyment_563.pdf
People make the difference….ppt
Termination letter.doc