404 - The content no longer exists on our network.

But we found simillar discussions which you may find interesting... please review them below.

Search for "Supreme Court Grants Recognition Transgenders Third Gender"


Supreme court and high court judgements
Dear friends thank you very much for your response to my post on supreme court and high court judgements in 2008. please see attached new file on same topic. it conntains judgements till sept. 2010. best regards narendra
Supreme court decission on epf
Dear friends please see attachement supreme court has now formally declare that leave encashment amount is not a basic wage for deduction of pf.
Directors not vicariously liable for crime of company – supreme court
Directors not vicariously liable for crime of company supreme court m/s. thermax ltd. & ors. vs. k.m. johny & ors. supreme court in the appeal case 'm/s thermax ltd vs k m johny' the supreme court stated that "though civil law recognizes the principle of vicarious liability of directors of companies the concept is not acknowledged in criminal law." in this case the company was accused of criminal offences and the directors were also named in the complaint case moved by a contracting party due to disputes over the termination of the agreement. earlier the bombay high court had allowed the prosecution to proceed. on appeal the supreme court quashed the complaint and set aside the high court order. the supreme court stated that there was no specific allegation against the members of the board of directors or senior executives but they have been roped in for being in the management of the company. the offence of cheating and misappropriation of property could be filed only against the company and not against the persons in such circumstances the court said. provisions of the negotiable instruments act and the industrial disputes act cannot be imported into the offences under the indian penal code the judgment explained. regards kamal
Claiming gratuity for 4 years and 8 months - company says gratuity act is not approved by supreme court
Hi good evening... recently i resigned my job and my job period is 4 year 8 month 25 days. but my company not giving me gratuity. and giving reason that gratuity act is not approved by supreme court. can get that supreme court judgement.
Supreme court order on safety of all schools in the country
Dear friends i would like to share important judgement given by supreme court on 13.4.2009. court has held that it is fundamental right of every child to get education free from fear of security and safety. court has given detailed guidelines and ordered that all government and private schools in the country must follow safety measures prescribed by national building code of india 2005. court also directed that all existing schools must provide fire extinguishing equipments within 6 months. are all schools following the court order today in right spirit? thanks
Gujarat high court order - employees can not be held responsible if the employer grants terminal benefits in excess of their entitlement
Dear members attached please read the gujarat high court order. as per this order employees can not be held responsible if the employer grants terminal benefits in excess of their entitlement. gujarat high court quashes recovery order.