404 - The content no longer exists on our network.

But we found simillar discussions which you may find interesting... please review them below.

Search for "Vote Taj Mahal"


Truth about taj mahal
Dear friends i hope you all must have read beow article about the truth of taj mahal ? i got the following as an email forward: truth about taj mahal read carefully and think yourself may be the biggest love story in indian history is a blunder of historian now read no one has ever challenged it except prof. p. n. oak who believes the whole world has been duped. in his book taj mahal: the true story oak says the taj mahal is not queen mumtaz s tomb but an ancient hindu temple palace of lord shiva then known as tejo mahalaya . in the course of his research oak discovered that the shiva temple palace was usurped by shah jahan from then maharaja of jaipur jai singh. in his own court chronicle badshahnama shah jahan admits that an exceptionally beautiful grand mansion in agra was taken from jai singh for mumtaz s burial . the exmaharaja of jaipur still retains in his secret collection two orders from shah jahan for surrendering the taj building. using captured temples and mansions as a burial place for dead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among muslim rulers. for example humayunakbar etmududdaula and safdarjung are all buried in such mansions. oak s inquiries began with the name of taj mahal. he says the term "mahal" has never been used for a building in any muslim countries from afghanisthan to algeria. "the unusual explanation that the term taj mahal derives from mumtaz mahal was illogical in atleast two respects. firstly her name was never mumtaz mahal but mumtazulzamani" he writes. secondly one cannot omit the first three letters 'mum' from a woman s name to derive the remainder as the name for the building."taj mahal he claims is a corrupt version of tejo mahalaya or lord shiva s palace . oak also says the love story of mumtaz and shah jahan is a fairy tale created by court sycophants blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists . not a single royal chronicle of shah jahan s time corroborates the love story. furthermore oak cites several documents suggesting the taj mahal predates shah jahan s era and was a temple dedicated to shiva worshipped by rajputs of agra city. for example prof. marvin miller of new york took a few samples from the riverside doorway of the taj. carbon dating tests revealed that the door was 300 years older than shah jahan. european traveler johan albert mandelslowho visited agra in 1638 only seven years after mumtaz s death describes the life of the cit y in his memoirs. but he makes no reference to the taj mahal being built. the writings of peter mundy an english visitor to agra within a year of mumtaz s death also suggest the taj was a noteworthy building well before shah jahan s time. prof. oak points out a number of design and architectural inconsistencies that support the belief of the taj mahal being a typical hindu temple rather than a mausoleum. many rooms in the taj mahal have remained sealed since shah jahan s time and are still inaccessible to the public. oak asserts they contain a headless statue of lord shiva and other objects commonly used for worship rituals in hindu temples . fearing political backlash indira gandhi s government tried to have prof. oak s book withdrawn from the bookstores and threatened the indian publisher of the first edition dire consequences . there is only one way to discredit or validate oak s research. the current government should open the sealed rooms of the taj mahal under u.n. supervision and let international experts investigate. do circulate this to all you know and let them know about this reality note : i do not want to hurt any religion here.. redits just an discussion if it is true or not ? how many of you agree with professor oak ? looking forward for your votes
Historical blunder....
Historical blunder.... we all know taj as symbol of love but the other lesser known facts are: 1. mumtaz was shahjahan s 4th wife out of his 7 wives 2. shahjahan killed mumtaz s husband to marry her 3. mumtaz died in her 14th delivery 4. he then married mumtaz s sister question arises where the hell is the rgrds
Regarding leave rules on election day
Hi members we have elections in pune on the 23rd of april. wanted to know what norms are the companies following with respect to leave. 1. have the companies declared it an official day off so that employees can vote 2. have they provided timeoff facility to their employees to vote and come back to work 3. if someone wants to go and vote in a constituency outside pune on the same day would that be considered as a leave or an off? kindly let me have your suggestions nikita
Power of "49 -o"
Dear all in general most of us reluctant to vote as we do not feel candidates deserve . do you know that there is a system in our constitution as per the 1969 act in section " 49o" that a person can go to the polling booth confirm his identity get his finger marked and convey the presiding election officer that he doesn t want to vote anyone yes such a feature is available but these leaders have never disclosed it for obvious reasons. this is called "49o". it is suggested to use the facility . now if a candidate wins say by 123 votes and that particular ward has received "49o" votes more than 123 then that polling will be cancelled and will have to be repolled. not only that but the candidature of the contestants will be removed and they cannot contest the repolling since people had already expressed their decision on them. this would bring fear into parties and hence look for genuine candidates for their parties for election. this would change the way; of our whole political system.it is seemingly surprising why the election commission has not revealed such a feature to the public.... please spread this news to as many as you know... seems to be a wonderful weapon against corrupt parties in india .show your power expressing your desire not to vote for anybody is even more powerful than voting.so don t miss your chance. so either vote or vote not to vote vote 49o and pass this info on... use your voting right for a better
Lta/ltc policy
Hi i am taj hrexecutive. anybody can provide policy. i would realy be thankful. regds taj qaiser
Article 49-0 of the constitution
Dear all did you know that there is a system in our constitution as per the 1969 act in section "49o" that a person can go to the polling booth confirm his identity get his finger marked and convey the presiding election officer that he doesn t want to vote anyone yes such a feature is available but obviously these seemingly notorious leaders have never disclosed it. this is called "49o". why should you go and say "i vote because in a ward if a candidate wins say by 123 votes and that particular ward has received "49o" votes more than 123 then that polling will be cancelled and will have to be repolled . not only that but the candidature of the contestants will be removed and they cannot contest the repolling since people had already expressed their decision on them . this would bring fear into parties and hence look for genuine candidates for their parties for election. this would change the way of our whole political system... it is seemingly surprising why the election commission has not revealed such a feature to the public.... please spread this news to as many as you know seems to be a wonderful weapon against corrupt parties in india... show your powerexpressing your desire not to vote for anybody is even more powerful than voting... so don t miss your chance. so either vote or vote not to vote vote 49o and pass this info on... "please forward this mail to as many as possible so that we the people of india can really use this power to save our nation". use your voting right for a better regards bhuwan 9911612991