404 - The content no longer exists on our network.

But we found simillar discussions which you may find interesting... please review them below.

Search for "Protected Workmen Protect Workmen"


Id act - what is the meaning for protected workmen in industrial dispute act 1947?
What is the meaning for protected workmen in industrial dispute act 1947. what should be the percentage of "protected workmen" of the total number of workmen employed in any establishment? ans is 1. how to arrive 1 sir.
Want to know about protected workmen
Dear seniors can any one brief about 'protected workmen". regards sanjay kumar
Termination of protected workmen??
Hi could anyone provide input on necessary steps to be taken for termination of a "protected workmen" on account of misconduct.. is there any difference in approching these situations in comparison to other employees termination on account of misconduct? rgds mahesh 7259650011
Know about 'protected workmen' under id act,1948
Dear friends when we learn industrial disputes act 1947 there are some terms and definitions which require a lot of explanations. even the courts have tried to interpret these terms in different situations in different ways. hence an ordinary student will be confused in understanding these terms. the term ' protected workmen' is one among those most confusing and much interpreted one. see the regards pbs
Is it justified to dismiss a workman (past history of indiscipline) in the first instance of absconding?
Is it justified to dismiss a workman in the first instance of absconding? a workmen absconded from work and after several letters to his residence a charge sheet is shared with the workmen for absence from duties without any intimation/ approval and domestic enquiry has been initiated. 4 sittings were scheduled communicated in advance through registered post but the charge sheeted workmen did not appear nor communicated his inability to appear. the enquiry officer closed the enquiry exparte and held him guilty of the charges. the second show cause has been sent to the workmen but no reply to that also. the management hence dismissed the workmen and sent the dismissal letter to the workmen. the workmen did not reply to that either. the workmen neither has past history of indiscipline nor any warning issued for any misconduct. in this case is it justified to dismiss the above said workmen ?
Id act - difference between sec 33 (1) & 33 (3)
Dear sir i have the following doubt regarding sec 33 of id act. sec 33 1 deals with common worker who involved in a misconduct which is under conciliation proceedings. in such case the employer should not change the conditions of service relating to the dispute and if he want to dismiss him he has to take permission from the concerned authority. sec 33 3 is also telling the same thing but it is related to protected workmen. my doubt is that when the above two sections are telling same thing. what is the diff between these two? and what is the addition protection to the protected workmen. kindly clarify. regards m s giri