What is defination of quality education?
Until institutes of this private limited promotees invest time, energy, money to develop know-how through research and development activities this become management jargon and commercial gimmick.
Institutes like these only promote commercial objectives to generate revenue for the institutes. Had they been into research and development they definately would have got Nobel Laureates and Scholers. They do not possess any world class know-how or methodologies of global recognitions to say as quality education.
This is bogus propoganda of quality education has no yardstick to measure what is quality element in their education. What we understand the term Quality means world class, global standard is quality. This require measure of Nobel Prize Nominees and scholers produced by such quality institutes. Which has no relevence with this kind of Institutes functioning in India. Therefore its bogus prpoganda.
Moreover, this differentiation is discriminatory and bias which is not global practice. No institutes can be measure in this manner of verbal debates or imaginary conclusions. This myth spreading propoganda and scandal mongering was old tricks now but in this Information Technology Age people are accessible to counter checking of information and meausre the bluff masterings. We are accessible to all kind of information to varify the what exactly they delievere.
Basically, these Missionary and RSS promoted institutes use rumors as weapon patronise social perception by reinforcing the myths in the minds of people of their superemacy but the fact is they are merely scandal mongering institutes.
Any form of discrimination with other educational institutes and university are
medieval age Apartheid
practice. Specially this act is nothing but promotional activity of Indian discriminatory caste system into education system representing elite education class for no authenticy in disguise of quality education.
THIS PROMOTES TOTAL INJUSTICE WITH UNIVERSITY EDUCATION AND UNDERMINING THE FORMAL UNIVERSITY EDUCATION SYSTEM IN THE COUNTRY BY PROPOGANDA CONSPIRACY. Rashid Quote:
Originally Posted by Ranganathan V  Hi,
Long distance education is primarly meant for working professionals who do not want to quit their jobs and do a full time program. Secondly, the satellite like program deliver knowledge that is required in a streached pattern of 3 yrs in comparision to 2 yrs of a regular program. If you want do 2 yrs then take a sabatical from the company and do that, if its permitted.
As far as the crenditial is concerned, at least amoung Indian companies, XLRI & TISS is given priority in HR programs, while IIM (A) is also equally good. If I need to rate one amoung these top ranked then XLRI is the best.
You need to pay for the quality of education that you wish to take. This is a funded instituation which has tradition behind and quality too. If you have studied in colleges like St Stephen's Delhi or Loyola Chennai then you will be able to appreciate the quality of education that they render.
Regards |
Why I am asking this question is I have seen many job portals in which it has been mentioned that "only full time from Premier B-schools of India". In this case what will be the value for Satellite Programme?
So in this case also if we compare both programmes, then where will the satellite programme will stand? 
