404 - The content no longer exists on our network.

But we found simillar discussions which you may find interesting... please review them below.

Search for "Id Act 1947 Sec 33 2 B"


Id act - difference between sec 33 (1) & 33 (3)
Dear sir i have the following doubt regarding sec 33 of id act. sec 33 1 deals with common worker who involved in a misconduct which is under conciliation proceedings. in such case the employer should not change the conditions of service relating to the dispute and if he want to dismiss him he has to take permission from the concerned authority. sec 33 3 is also telling the same thing but it is related to protected workmen. my doubt is that when the above two sections are telling same thing. what is the diff between these two? and what is the addition protection to the protected workmen. kindly clarify. regards m s giri
Whether works committee under sec.3 of id act 1947 is required to be formed?
Sir i am in doubt whether i ask such question or not.sir i am working in a large psu company with 21000 workforce. in my company there are so many committees are existing for the welfare of the workers. well organized trade unions are operating under tu act.various committees like jt.consultative comm.bipartitetripartite safety committee welfare committee & house allotment committee etc.are functioning. my question is whether works committee under sec.3 of id act 1947 is required to be formed. kindly advise.
Section 9a under id act 1947 not applicable
Under what circumstances sec 9a of id act 1947 in stu wheel service was done by four employees due to new kits and modern tools the stu mangt.asked to do the wheel service with three employees now trade union make a complaint before labour officer is it correct
I.d. act, 1947
Can my contractor who is engaging 150 contract labours in noncore activity has to apply to the state government for permission under sec. 25n of i.d. act for termination of a few unscrupulous contract labours as sec.2j of id act covers contract establishment also? pl. advise.
Which is industrial establishment under sec 25(n) of id act, 1947
Hi senior members 1. does it companies comes under purview of industry as defined under sec 2j of industrial dispute act 1947 2. does sec 25n applies to industry as given in sec 2j? because 25l refering to chapter vb to which 25n also belongs says 25l. definitions.for the purposes of this chapter a industrial establishment means i a factory as defined in clause m of section 2 of the factories act 1948 63 of 1948; ii a mine as defined in clause i of sub section 1 of section 2 of the mines act 1952 35 of 1952; or iii a plantation as defined in clause f of section 2 of the plantations labour act 1951 69 of 1951; so my question is here in 25l they have given narrow meaning of industry than sec 2j here it mentions only factory mine & plantation as industrial establishment. so kindly enlighten me with your wisdom which view is correct? please mention any case laws.
Terminate two of my middle management and one supervisor. as per sec.2(s) of i.d. act, 1947 - what is the appropriate forum for them that they seek redressal?
I wanted to terminate two of my middle management and one supervisor. as per sec.2s of i.d. act 1947 they cannot come under the purview of " workmen". according to me they cannot rise a dispute under sec. 2k of the said act. now what is the appropriate forum for them that they seek redressal? and what enactments help them to seek redressal? can they get any remedy for their unwanted terminations? pl. provide inputs as to what steps i need to do to remove them? it would be very much helpful if all your suggestions supported by appropriate judgments of high courts or the supreme court.